ADAM MEMBREY

  • ABOUT ME
  • FILM
  • MUSINGS
  • BOOKS
  • DRAWINGS

Duking It Out: ESPN 30 for 30’s ‘I Hate Christian Laettner’

April 14, 2015 by Adam Membrey

AP MARCH MADNESS BEST MOMENTS BASKETBALL S BKC FILE USA PA

It used to be that the sports scores were simply reported in the newspaper, all facts and figures and no flair. You knew where it happened, who was involved, and the various stats that followed. It was a game, and now it was over and on to the next one.

But somewhere along the way, we decided stats were not enough. We had to find a way to entertain ourselves in-between the games. So we created narratives. We came up with stories to lead into the game. We asked question after question of these poor athletes WHO HAD YET TO PLAY THE GAME what it all would mean. We gave them more to think about than the game itself.

The internet has only made it worse. Now every game has a narrative, a quote, a theme that is played out and stretched to its exhaustive end. We must entertain every angle, even as the story changes with each made shot or intercepted pass. It’s the same thing with any other kind of media or entertainment we consume these days – individual episodes of TV are frequently recapped by a deluge of writers; everyone has to comment on the latest Twitter feud; every photographed action by a celebrity is gossiped about, over and over again. We are learning to comment on things and forgetting to live our own lives.

That’s the beauty of ESPN’s 30 for 30 series. It takes it back to the basics, namely that the people at the center of all these great stories are, in fact, people. They have thoughts and feelings just like you and me. Regardless of the situation – whether it involves large sums of money, individual fame, or the tearing of a team fabric – they all have feelings and emotions not unlike the rest of us. And we forget that. We forget that when we talk about how much we hate a player; we forget that when we make threats on Twitter and argue about how lame they are in the lunch room. We forget that when we throw out their whole goodwill of a career and focus on their one little screwup – a screwup, of which, honestly, was just a clash of physics and probability.

I knew a lot of people hated Christian Laettner. I knew his name was thrown around as much of a punchline to many weak jokes. But I never really knew why. Why would one of the greatest college players of all time, who made perhaps the greatest shot in college basketball history, be so reviled? This documentary goes to great pains to show the 5 different criteria that seem to make up the Holy Temple of Laettner Hatred. And the film goes through each one of them, with exhaustive interviews from a great variety of sources – coaches, fans, media personalities, players he played with and against – and shows how each one of those 5 criteria is not what we thought it was. We may have hated Christian Laettner, but we certainly didn’t know him.

But it wasn’t Laettner the person we hated, we say. It was what he represented. Well, this film takes apart each of these representations and shows how hollow they are. You may still hate Duke. You may still hate Laettner the basketball player. But by the end, you will have a hard time hating Christian Laettner, the human being.

I Hate Christian Laettner is currently streaming on Netflix. 

Filed Under: FILM

INTRODUCING ‘REDBOX READY’ – Week of April 14th

April 11, 2015 by Adam Membrey

RedboxLogo

Here’s the thing: I read about movies a lot more than I actually see them. There’s only so much time. There’s only so much energy. So when you make a choice of a movie to watch, you obviously want it to be worth your time. Netflix and Amazon Prime have so many options that it’s literally a full-time job to keep track of all of it. Not everyone has the cable or those premium movie channels. But Redbox? Everyone has some kind of access to Redbox.

But when you go to a Redbox kiosk, if feels like there’s a clock counting down. There’s already either a line waiting behind you, or people are slowly moving through the parking lot and heading your direction. You have a limited amount of time to make a pretty important choice. The sad thing? You don’t have a lot of information to make that choice. You can see the movie covers. You can try and read the synopsis, but that always takes up more time and angers the people behind you. What would happen if you went to Redbox with an informed mental list of what you wanted to get? You could not only pick a good movie, but in a short amount of time.

Enter Redbox Ready. Each week, I’m hoping to give you some short snippets about the Redbox releases so you can make an informed choice. I can’t guarantee you’ll love the movie, but I can guarantee you’ll know more about it than if you had not read this column.

Since I know some of you reading this have a family to consider, I’m going to introduce a new aspect: The Blush Factor. Again, I’ve read about far more movies here than I’ve seen, so I can’t promise anything; but I will do my best to warn you of the Blush Factor – you know, anything that might make you nervous around your family. Swearing, sex, lots of violence – that kind of thing. Sometimes you can tell by the film’s rating; sometimes you can tell by the people who wrote the script and made the actual movie. There’s nothing lamer than taking a movie home you’re excited about only to find a few minutes in that it’s totally not appropriate for the audience watching it. Let’s avoid that blushing.

Coming to Redbox on April 14th:

BigEyes

Big Eyes (2014) – directed by Tim Burton, starring Amy Adams and Christoph Waltz

Rotten Tomatoes: 71 %, Audience Score: 70% Liked It

Director Tim Burton has had his head in the CGI clouds for some time now. Go back to his first films and you’ll see a man enamored with the practical – stop-motion and make-up, the eerily realistic over the disarmingly fake. But more and more, Burton’s style began to completely overwhelm any story he was trying to tell. The Master of Macabre got drunk on his own medicine. It then led into a movie I still find grotesquely ugly – 2010’s Alice in Wonderland – for just how full of clashing, poorly composited CGI it is. I resigned myself to the fact that maybe Burton was gone for good. We got some good movies out of him; we could all move on. But then 2012’s Frankenweenie saw him return to the stop-motion that pushed him in the early years, and 2014’s Big Eyes has been reported as a nice return to storytelling form. There’s no major CGI or dark, quirky design elements. This is Burton telling a simple story and telling it well. Let’s hope it’s a sign of good things to come.

The Short Story: Margarent Keane is known for painting figures with unusually large eyes and, running from her husband with only her paintings and her kids, runs into Walter Keane, a fellow painter. Walter goes off selling the paintings while Margaret paints at home – but she doesn’t know he’s actually selling the paintings as his own.

Blush Factor: Pretty low. It’s PG-13 for “brief strong language”. If you have an earmuffs set on hand for the family, you should be just fine.

EXODUS

Exodus: God and Kings (2014) – directed by Ridley Scott, starring Christian Bale and Joel Edgerton

Rotten Tomatoes: 28%, Audience Score: 37% Liked It

Ridley Scott is 78 years old. Just how many people do we know of that age who are making a 140 million dollar epic in the Middle East? You can take that as a sign that this movie has been imbued with some kind of amazing life force that refuses to die – or you can take it as a sign that studios will make anything with Scott as long as he’s still standing. But very few directors today can direct an epic with the eye that Scott has. He’s proven it time and time again over the years, and early trailers showed he still has that visual acumen. The movie gained a lot of controversy early on for having stars that look nothing like someone from the Middle East – like Hollywood’s never done that before.

The Short Story: Moses is pretty fed up with the Egyptian Pharaoh Ramses and leads 600,000 slaves on a pretty incredible, action-packed escape from Egypt.

Blush Factor: This is a PG-13 epic for “violence including battle sequences and intense images”. Expect a lot of fighting and maybe some digital blood. PG-13 movies are getting away with violence in ways they never have before, so be aware of that. The other Blush Factor? Respected actors Christian Bale and Joel Edgerton hitting the tanning salon too much in their attempt to look Middle Eastern.

The Babadook

The Babadook (2014) – written and directed by Jennifer Kent

Rotten Tomatoes: 98%, Audience Score: 75 % Liked It

The reputation of this Australian film precedes it. Every time I’ve heard the name of it, it’s always been after someone describing it as one of the scariest movies they’ve ever seen. Even better, it seems to that kind of scary flick that leans less on jump-scares on more on psychological horror, while somehow splicing in a really moving story about parents and children.

The Short Story: A mother loses her husband in a car crash. Her only son, whom she’s raising on her own, begins fearing monsters that no one else can see. They read a book about the ‘Badabook’ monster who lurks around the shadows of the house. This isn’t going to be a picnic.

Blush Factor: the film is unrated at the moment, but it has been called one of the scariest films in years by many, many people. In other words: leave the kids out of this one. The only other blush factor to worry about is how often you’ll accidentally pee your pants.

PenguinsofMad

The Penguins of Madagascar (2014) – directed by Eric Darnell and Simon J. Smith

Rotten Tomatoes: 71%, Audience Score: 64% Liked It

The Dreamworks Animation franchise train keeps on rolling. After their successful TV show on Nickelodeon, it only made sense to make a Penguins of Madagascar movie. But since this film didn’t do too well at the box office (and Dreamworks Animation’s films have been struggling at the box office in general) enjoy it’s existence, with all its random lines and odd verbal jokes intact.

Short Story: If you know the plot of Despicable Me 2, you know the general plot of this profoundly silly, completely delightful film. The Penguins get wrapped up in a mission to stop an evil octopus from making all other penguins around the world far less cute and a lot more ugly. You read that right.

Blush Factor: Really low. This film is rated PG for “mild action and some rude humor”. So, farting. And maybe a couple jokes that will go completely over your kids’ heads.

 Other Movies on Redbox Totally Worth Checking Out:

BigHero6

Big Hero 6 (2014) – Directed by Don Hall and Chris Williams

Rotten Tomatoes: 89%, Audience Score: 92% Liked It

This not only made my Top 10 List for the Year of 2014, but probably the Top 5 list of every kid in America. You can’t resist the cuteness of Baymax or the emotional story that threads its way through the movie. I work with deaf students with special needs, and I’m still amazed at how many details they remember and are able to communicate to me. You can pull out any movie from 2014 in front of them, and every single one of them picks Big Hero 6. This is a movie that has stuck to a lot of people for a variety of reasons. Disney has every right to be as proud of this film as they are.

Short Story: If you don’t know already, it’s about a young tech prodigy named Hiro who loses his older brother in a tragic accident and is stuck with his invention, a personal health care companion robot known as Baymax. Hiro also meets a group of well-meaning nerds who band together to fight against a dark power attacking the city of San Fransokyo.

Blush Factor: rated PG for “action and peril, some rude humor, and thematic elements”. The brother dying might be a bit tough for some little kids to take, but the real blush factor is going to be how much of a weeping baby you are by the end, and with nowhere to hide.

BeyondtheLIghts

Beyond the Lights (2014) – Directed by Gina Prince-Bythewood

Rotten Tomatoes: 81%, Audience Score: 79% Liked It

When I was in high school, I heard many girls talk about this movie, Love & Basketball. It sounded too corny for a guy to like, so I promptly ignored it. When I got to college? Even more women who loved this movie and wouldn’t stop talking about it. If you were one of those women? That movie was directed by Prince-Bythewood and this is her first movie since 2008’s The Secret Life of Bees and only her third feature film overall. She might not make many, but she makes them good.

The Short Story: a young music superstar (up-and-comer Gugu Mbatha-Raw) is caving in from the pressures of fame until she meets Kaz (Nate Parker), a young cop who helps her become the person she’s always wanted to be.

Blush Factor: PG-13 for some minor sexual provocation, some minor violence, and some minor swearing. Nothing too crazy. Just enjoy the movie.

tn_gnp_et_1011_whiplash

Whiplash (2014) – Directed and Written by Damien Chazelle

Rotten Tomatoes: 95%, Audience Score: 95%

I saw Whiplash a couple months ago in a theater and just couldn’t find a way to say anything about the film that hasn’t already been said before, and better. This is simply an incredible film about a young drummer and the man who pushes him past his limits. You may question his methods, but you won’t question just how kickass a movie this is. The final 20 minutes are my favorite stretch-run of any movie I’ve seen in the past year – I still get goosebumps just thinking about it.

The Short Story: a young freshman drummer goes to college, intent on being great. He runs into a demanding band instructor who wants nothing more than the best from his players. Something’s gotta give.

Blush Factor: There is a lot of language in this film, and most of it screamed by Oscar-winning actor J.K. Simmons. Because the camera closes in tight on him frequently, it may feel as though he’s in the room, and maybe even yelling at you. If you can’t handle obscenities at high volume, then maybe this film isn’t for you.

BookOfLife

The Book of Life (2014) – Directed by Jorge R. Gutierrez

Rotten Tomatoes: 82%, Audience Score: 78%

Imagine taking a kaleidoscope, a firecracker, and some confetti and tossing it in a blender. Whatever you get out of that is still not nearly as colorful as The Book of Life. I highly recommend seeing this on the biggest screen and with the best picture possible. The artwork in this film is jaw-dropping, and when the film goes to the Land of the Remembered? You haven’t seen anything this gorgeously colorful. This is a film that celebrates the director’s culture as well as his American influences with some nice popular song covers. It’s about the most heartfelt movie you will see this year outside of Big Hero 6, and something for everyone to enjoy.

Short Story: Manolo, a young man torn between his family’s legacy and what he really wants, finds himself in the middle of a supernatural wager to win the love of his life. You’ve seen this kind of story before, but never with the verve, the depth, or the colors that this one has.

Blush Factor: PG for some mild action, rude humor, and scary images. There are some character designs that are pretty crazy, and the character of Xibalba might be a little visually intense for some.

Birdman

Birdman (2014) – Directed by Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu

Rotten Tomatoes: 93%, Audience Score: 80% Liked It

After their fractured-narrative films of Amores Perros, 21 Grams, and Babel, Inarritu and his collaborating writer Guillermo Arriaga went through a bad break-up. No one seems to know exactly what happened, but what followed was a re-evaluation: who was more responsible for how good their three films were? Did Inarritu carry it to greatness and make a decent script great? Did Arriaga create stories Inarritu merely had to point and shoot? Were the two of them just a beautiful collaboration of two distinct artistic voices?

Both men struck out on their own with Inarritu’s Biutiful being praised for it’s electric direction and incredible central performance from Javier Bardem, but derided for a weak and contrived script. Arriaga himself overwrote his directorial debut in The Burning Plain, with his script being called overly symbolic, too much like his other fractured, multiple narrative stories, and without emotional resonance. So who was going to emerge with the career, to get back on track?

While Arriaga has mostly made short films since, Inarritu collaborated with a team of writers and came out with the awards season darling Birdman, which won Oscars for Best Picture, Best Directing, Best Original Screenplay, and Best Cinematography. He’s now shooting a movie, The Revenant, with Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy. Not too shabby.

Short Story: The film follows a washed-up actor (Michael Keaton) as he battles his demons in the days leading up to the opening of his new Broadway play.

Blush Factor: Rated R. Lots of swearing, some sex, and a fair amount of bloody violence. It wouldn’t be an Inarritu film without a little bit of everything.

Mockingjay

Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1 – Directed by Francis Lawrence

Rotten Tomatoes: 65%, Audience Score: 74% Liked It

Director Francis Lawrence brought a nice eye to Catching Fire that gave the film some visual flair and epic world-building. The real problem with this film is that it really only tells half of a story, with the second half of Mockingjay hitting theaters in November. You can blame Lionsgate for that decision, but you can’t blame them for giving the production what it needs to make a pretty incendiary movie.

The Short Story: Katniss continues the fight in District 13. What more do you need to know?

Blush Factor: PG-13 for “intense sequences of violence and action, some disturbing images and thematic material”. A revolution was never going to be pretty or go quietly.

Interstellar

Interstellar (2014) – Directed by Christopher Nolan 

Rotten Tomatoes: 72%, Audience Score: 86% Liked It

Last time Nolan followed up a Batman movie with 200-million dollar budget thinkpiece, we got 2010’s Inception. This time, following The Dark Knight Rises, we get Interstellar. Both times the media knew very little about these original films while they were being made. Nolan is one of the few who can command the budget, the large roster of incredible actors, and still remain in relative secrecy until just before film opens. While I’m still amazed I have not yet seen Nolan’s latest, it goes without saying that this is not a film to see when you’re tired – unless you want to fall asleep. There are a number of high-concepts tossed around here, and all of it played out by a large group of game actors. They don’t make movies much like this anywhere, so if you’re one of those people who complains that Hollywood is always dumbing down to it’s audience, this is your antidote.

Short Story: The Earth, devastated by drought and famine, is making it hard for people to survive. Our main character (Matthew McConaughey) must lead a team on a space shuttle deep into the space-time contiuum to try and find another hospitable planet and save the world before it ends. I think. I think that’s it. It’s pretty complicated stuff. Just see the movie!

Blush Factor: Low. Some “intense perilous action and brief strong language:. So, a lot of things go wrong and sometimes people swear about them like normal people do. Nolan’s films have been rather sexless affairs, so no need to worry on that front, either.

Under The Radar, But Now Pinging For Attention

AMostViolentYEar

A Most Violent Year (2014) – Directed by J.C. Chandor

Rotten Tomatoes: 90%, Audience Score: 73% Liked It

You know a movie’s going to be good when it’s about something that sounds entirely boring, and yet people talk about how explosive it is. Even better: putting two of today’s finest actors – Oscar Isaac and Jessica Chastain – together as the couple at the heart of it.

Short Story: Set in 1981 New York City, historically a year of violence, a young immigrant and his family try to make it out as oil salesmen. I told you it sounded kinda boring. But it appears to be anything but. And about that violence of this most violent year? Only two people die in the entire film.

Blush Factor: Rated R. Lots of violence and lots of swearing. You didn’t think 1981 New York City would be anything but, didn’t you?

TheVoices

The Voices (2014) – Directed by Marjane Satrapi

Rotten Tomatoes: 72%, Audience Score: 60% Liked It

Director Satrapi, who made the great graphic novel (and film adaptation) Persepolis, returns to the directing chair to work off another person’s script. The same dark sense of humor is here. Also joining in the fun is an entirely game, incredible acting performance from Ryan Reynolds, as well as nice turns from Gemma Arterton and Anna Kendrick.

The Short Story: Jerry (Reynolds) clearly has some issues but is refusing to take his meds. As a result, his cat, Mr. Whiskers, starts speaking to him about sinister, evil deeds, while his dog, Boscoe, does his doggy best to persuade him he’s still a good person and he can always do the right thing. The two voices grow louder and louder as Jerry continues to avoid taking his meds, leading him down a pretty awful path he can’t back away from.

The Blush Factor: there’s a lot of swearing in this one, with most of it coming from the cat (of course!). There’s also a lot of violence and blood and completely unexpected things being stocked up in piles of tupperware. The humor in the film takes some of the edge off, but this is still one bloody film.

TheDouble

The Double (2013) – Directed by Richard Ayoade

Rotten Tomatoes: 82%, Audience Score: 60% Liked It

Richard Ayoade, an actor mostly known for British comedy series, The IT Factor, carved out a nice spot for himself as a director with his debut, Submarine. I’ve been dying to see his follow-up, and here it is, with great young actors Jesse Eisenberg and Mia Wasikowska in tow.

Short Story: a young, introverted clerk in a government agency arrives to work one day to find he has a new co-worker – an exact physical clone of him and yet his complete opposite – outgoing, charismatic, and spectacular with the ladies.

Blush Factor: the f-word is used up to 15 times, and there are reoccuring mentions of suicide throughout the movie, as well as an attempt at the beginning and middle of the movie.

Thedrop

The Drop (2014) – Directed by Michael R. Roskam

Rotten Tomatoes 89%, Audience Score: 77%

Don’t let the boring title deter you. Screenwriter Dennis Lehane should be a familiar name to any crime fiction fans as he’s responsible for the novels of which the movies Mystic River, Gone Baby Gone, and Shutter Island were all based on. He also was a writer for HBO’s The Wire, which is always a great stamp of approval in my book. Here, Lehane wrote his first screenplay as an adaptation of his own short story, “Animal Rescue”. The script was enough to attract the great cast of Tom Hardy and the late James Gandolfini.

The Short Story: A bartender (Hardy) who makes money drops finds himself caught in the middle of a robbery gone awry, entrenching him in an investigation that reveals a town that works together to make a living, regardless of the costs.

Blush Factor: Rated R for a ton of swearing (66 f-words!) and violence. This is a crime film after all.

TopFive

Top Five (2014) – Directed by Chris Rock

Rotten Tomatoes: 88%, Audience Score: 67%

I’ve never been convinced of Chris Rock as an actor. Every movie he’s in, he seems to be unable to blend into the scene. When Top Five took Sundance 2014 by storm, I figured, “Maybe he’s figured something out!”. But when I saw the film, the first half of it felt like that guy at a party who’s trying way too hard to sound smart. He uses obscure references. He moves around too much. He thinks he knows how things work when those who know better shake their head a little. There’s just too much going on, and it all seems to be a way for him to show you, “Look! I’ve come a long way!”. But once Rock, the director, writer, and actor, calms down about halfway through, the film gets a new charge. It feels like something real and organic. Rock looks comfortable with his luminous co-star Rosario Dawson. It feels like a film about two broken people trying to find their way around, and you totally buy it. It may take a while to get there, but once it does, it relaxes into a nice piece of work.

Short Story: A comedian who’s trying to make it as a serious actor agrees to allow him and his fiancé to be filmed for a documentary series about the days leading up to their wedding. Feeling the pressure, he takes a break from the madness and walks around with a journalist who’s intent on doing a story about him.

Blush Factor: Lots of nudity and sexual conversation, pretty non-stop profanity, and some drug use. Definitely not for the kids.

Foxcatcher

Foxcatcher (2014) – Directed by Bennett Miller

Rotten Tomatoes: 88%, Audience Score: 69%

This film first got attention as being “that movie where Steve Carrell has a beak for a nose” and “Can Channing Tatum win an Oscar?” Much of the award buzz unfortunately fizzled out as the year went on, but this appears to be still be a strong, potent film.

The Short Story: the film is based on a rather shocking true story, in which a Olympic Wrestling champion team of two brothers (Tatum and Mark Ruffalo) gets tangled up with a multimillionaire sponsor in John E. du Pont (Carrell) as they train for the 1988 Seoul Olympics. It doesn’t go well.

Blush Factor: Rated R for some violence and blood, brief profanity, drug use (cocaine), and a wrestler shown naked from behind as he weighs in. A gun murder is also shown.

Other Films Worth Considering: 

Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb

Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb (2014) – Directed by Shaun Levy

Rotten Tomatoes: 50%, Audience Score: 60% Liked It

You knew they were going to make a third film, because all Hollywood productions come in threes. If you enjoyed the first two, you will likely enjoy this final entry. It also sports one of Robin Williams last performances.

The Short Story: Larry goes to a museum in London to try and keep the magic alive.

Blush Factor: Low. Rated PG for “mild action, some rude humor and brief language”. If you see something awful, like a large monkey peeing on miniature Owen Wilson and Steve Coogan, ask your son, “Is that the appropriate place to tinkle?” and then pat yourself on your back as your child emphatically shakes his head.

Alexander

Alexander and the No Good, Horrible, Very Bad Day (2014) – Directed by Miguel Arteta

Rotten Tomatoes: 62%, Audience Score: 60%

Director Miguel Arteta has been behind some pretty great little films of the last 10 years – Cedar Rapids, Youth in Revolt, and The Good Girl – as well as a great deal of television episodes. Here, he’s adapting Judith Viorst’s classic children’s book for the screen, and it appears to be just about what you expect – a movie about all the things that can go wrong and still remind you how lucky you are to have the family you do.

The Short Story: It’s all the there in the title. Alexander and his family don’t have a very good day.

Blush Factor: Rated PG. Some mild bathroom humor, a bit of slapstick violence, some pretty tame language. All in all: some good family fun.

dumbandumberto

Dumb and Dumber To (2014) – Directed by The Farrelly Brothers

Rotten Tomatoes: 29%, Audience Score: 39% Liked It

You won’t find many people a bigger fan of 1994’s Dumb and Dumber than this guy. I still laugh just as hard at it as I did twenty years ago. I initially found myself kind of excited about Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels reprising their roles from 20 years ago. Cautious optimism, I guess. But then the trailers came out, and some of the jokes seemed like they had been imported from a far crasser Farrelly Brothers movie. It didn’t feel the same. Something felt off. That got confirmed when the movie came out when several critics noted how, unlike the first film, there seemed to be a mean streak with the characters. The original film might have had Harry and Lloyd do some pretty awful things – but they never had any mean intent to them; they were simply clueless.

I still haven’t seen this film, and I’m not sure I really want to. I prefer to think of Harry and Lloyd as the lovable, well-meaning losers they are instead of the creepy, mean-spirited men they may have become. Check this out for yourself.

The Short Story: The boys go on a new road trip to find Harry’s newly discovered daughter, who had previously been given up for adoption.

Blush Factor: PG-13 for some crude sexual humor, some comedic violence, some drug use and some jokes that may be offensive to some.

Welp, that’s all for this week. Tune in next week for another edition of Redbox Ready.

Filed Under: FILM Tagged With: A MOST VIOLENT YEAR, ALEXANDER AND THE NO GOOD, BEYOND THE LIGHTS, BIG EYES, Big Hero 6, BIRDMAN, DUMB AND DUMBER TO, EXODUS: GODS AND KINGS, FOXCATCHER, HORRIBLE, INTERSTELLAR, MOCKINGJAY PART 1, NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM 3, Penguins of Madagascar, REDBOX READY, THE BABADOOK, THE BOOK OF LIFE, THE DOUBLE, THE DROP, THE VOICES, TOP FIVE, VERY BAD DAY, WHIPLASH

READ THIS: Bill Bryson’s ‘In A Sunburned Country’

March 31, 2015 by Adam Membrey

Sydney Harbor
Sydney Harbor

Australia is almost unworldly. From the time we Americans make our way through our geography units, we consistently have to flick that globe a few reps before we can get to the Land Down Under. It’s constantly out of sight. It’s rarely ever in the news. Its main sports are ones we don’t understand the rules of. And it’s too far to travel for many of us. It’s a place we hear about far more than we will ever see or experience.

One of the great benefits of being the son of an Australian is that I’ve been to Australia twice – once as a 6-month old child (which I obviously have no memory of), and again as an awkward, gawky 11-year-old. As wide-eyed as you can be seeing such an incredible country at such a young age, your brain doesn’t quite engage as much as it could with what it’s seeing. It doesn’t realize how special it all is, and how long it might be before you see it all again.

So there’s still so much about Australia I don’t have a clue about. And because Americans don’t seem to have a pressing need to know everything about the Land Down Under, it can be hard to find interesting resources. So hard, in fact, that we have to rely on a Brit to make it happen.

Enter travel author Bill Bryson. In fact, to call Bryson a travel writer seems rather limiting. I would say he is far more of a story-seeker than anything else. Yes, he wants to see the new patches of the world he has yet to visit. But he is also deeply interested in the stories that make them what they are. And, to our great advantage, he is able to distill them and write about them beautifully.

So what if told you there was a way to visit Australia without ever leaving your seat? Without paying for an expensive 12-hour flight? By simply going to your local bookstore or library (provided they’re cool enough)?

Sunburnt

Bill Bryson’s In A Sunburned Country, published in 2000, gives you just that opportunity. He goes as far as he can in the amount of time he has, covering a tremendous amount of ground while never skirting on the stories that he bumps into. In fact, as a born storyteller is wont to do, he begins the book with perhaps the most mind-blowing tidbit I’ve heard in a long time – a tidbit that’s so tantalizing and yet so perfectly encapsulates just how vast a land this place is.

 It happens that at 11:03 P.M. local time on May 28, 1993, seismograph needles all over the Pacific region twitched and scribbled in response to a very large-scale disturbance near a place called Banjawarn Station in the Great Victoria Desert of Western Australia. Some long-distance truckers and prospectors, virtually the only people out in the lonely expanse, reported seeing a sudden flash in the sky and hearing or feeling the boom of a mighty but far-off explosion. One reported that a can of beer had danced off the table in his tent.

But the seismographic profile didn’t fit that of an earthquake or mining explosion, and was actually “170 times more powerful than the most powerful mining explosion ever recorded in Western Australia”. Scientists puzzled over it and then set it away as an “unexplained curiosity”.

Then, in 1995, Japanese doomsday cult Aum Shinrikyo released large amounts of nerve gas into the Tokyo subway system, killing 12 people. Investigations followed and showed that Aum had actually held a 500,000 acre desert property in Western Australia very near where the event took place. It had also recruited nuclear engineers from the former Soviet Union. From those facts, it’s conceivable they formulated a nuclear bomb, set it off in the middle of the Australian desert, and no one ever noticed.

You take my point, of course,” Bryson continues, “This is a country that … is so vast and empty that a band of amateur enthusiasts could conceivably set off the world’s first non-governmental atomic bomb on its mainland and almost four years would pass before anyone noticed. Clearly this is a place worth getting to know.

From there, Bryson is off to the races, covering as much of this land he so clearly loves, uncovering as many interesting, colorful facts and faces as possible along the way. To say any more would be both a disservice to just how much he covers, but to how well he describes everything he finds. You will laugh a great deal at many of his discoveries, and find a deep appreciation for the colorful, surreal history that makes Australia unlike any place on Earth.

By the end, Bryson, not looking forward to leaving his enchanted place, sums it up perfectly:

Australia is mostly empty and a long way away. Its population is small and its role in the world consequently peripheral. It doesn’t have coups, recklessly overfish, arm disagreeable despots, grow coca in provocative quantities, or throw its weight around in a brash and unseemly manner. It is stable and peaceful and good. It doesn’t need watching, and so we don’t. But I will tell you this: the loss is entirely ours.

Check out this amazing bit of escapist reading. 

Filed Under: BOOKS Tagged With: AUSTRALIA, BILL BRYSON, BOOK REVIEW, LAND DOWN UNDER, OUTBACK

Is Godzilla Our Spirit Animal?

March 20, 2015 by Adam Membrey

Drawing with 'Enterprise' filter from Camera+; Text overlay from Over.

There was a time when social networks were almost entirely involuntary. You had to make that phone call. You had to go to your friend’s house and somehow get that baseball card back. You had to tell your little brother he wasn’t cool enough to join. You had to tell your co-worker why his failure to clean up his own coffee spills impacted your work performance.

If there was conflict, you had to deal with it. You had to pretty consistently attempt these gross, uncomfortable things called human interaction. You had to take something difficult and make it something tolerable. Sometimes it was simple; sometimes it was something much more complicated.

But now? Nearly all of our social networks are voluntary. If you don’t want to go to that party – you don’t have to. If you don’t want to respond to that text – you don’t have to. If you have issues with your coworkers, you can just do what we all do and talk about them behind their back – you don’t even have to confront them! When any social network – whether it be home, work, school, family, your recreation sports team – doesn’t work for you, you almost always have the option to either opt out or talk around it.

So what is the result of all this change? I feel like we’re all becoming our own Godzillas. This wireless world we live in is not unlike that nuclear matter the Lizard King came into contact with, causing us to grow in size each time we refuse to address the conflict in our lives. It gets to a point where we are so big and unwieldy, so cumbersome in our movement, that we can’t help but squash a few things when we make a move.

Sometimes it’s our dignity. Sometimes it’s our friendships. Sometimes it’s the bridge we needed to cross some day in the future.

I say all this as someone who admits to being a part of the problem. We are becoming a nation of complainers. It doesn’t take long to scroll through your Facebook and see everyone jumping on a new issue. It doesn’t take long for people to say really ugly things on comment boards that they would never have the balls to say in person. We choose to air our grievances around the problem, allowing the stress and frustration to slowly build us up into something we don’t even recognize. We can’t remember the things we love to do anymore. We kinda forget what a joyful moment feels like.

So let’s unplug once in a while. Let’s make eye contact longer than a couple fleeting seconds. Let’s find a way to have those icky, uncomfortable situations sooner, offering them out into the open and watching them transform into something far less threatening. Let’s make our world something we aren’t constantly trying to get away from.

Let’s find a new spirit animal. Something that builds us up rather than tears us down. Something that allows us to remember what joy feels like, in its most pure and unbridled of forms.

Let’s be the answer to the question we ask every day. Let’s be a new King of the Monsters, one who has slain the destructive forces before it, ready to take on the inevitable.

Let’s create social networks we want to be a part of. Let’s reward others not for being an asshole, but for that extra effort to be a good person.

The world is here, guys. Let’s make it something we want to be a part of.

Filed Under: MUSINGS Tagged With: Godzilla, SOCIAL NETWORKS, WIRELESS

ERNIE WEIGHS IN

March 10, 2015 by Adam Membrey

Drawing with Pinhole filter from Camera+
Drawing with Pinhole filter from Camera+

It started off with something simple.

While my students were partaking in various reward activities, I saw the front cover of Ernie’s Little Lie. As the story goes, the picture is of Ernie painting something and trying to decide whether it’s good enough for the local art contest, with its grand-prize of a watercolor paint set. That the word “lie” is in the title should give you an idea of the rest of the story. But that front cover had me wondering – what if Ernie was thinking looking at something other than a picture? What if I replaced the paintbrush with a pen? What if, instead of painting a picture, Ernie was hard at work trying to calculate his Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE), of which there are many complicated formulas to crunch numbers with? What if Ernie wanted to lose weight? Why would he even want to do such a thing?

The original inspiration.

I did a little research, and the answer became obvious: Ernie is literally bigger than Bert. They’re always arguing over food, but is Ernie really eating that much more than Bert? At least on TV?

A little further research and it turns out the size disparancy is no joke: Ernie is indeed bigger than Bert, and the reasons are of no fault to Ernie himself. They are completely different puppets.

Bert is a Hand-Rod Puppet – where the puppeteer’s dominant hand in the head of the puppet, often moving the mouth and sometimes the facial features. And because the puppeteer’s other hand is controlling rods that are connected to the arms and fingers, the puppets have much thinner arms.  Think Kermit, Elmo, and BERT.

Ernie, however, is a Live-Hand Puppet, which means his puppeteer will have one hand where his hands are (like a glove) and the other hand operating the head. He will also have another puppeteer using their hand to control his other hand (also like a glove). So not only does Ernie have 3 puppeteering hands moving around in his body, but he’s quite literally big-boned so that his frame looks more normal and proportionate with human hands.

Even if Ernie tried to prescribe an exercise program for the hands that control him – do some more moving, a little less resting around – it wouldn’t make much of a difference. What it really takes, more than anything, is to realize he can’t control his size, but he can control his attitude towards it. Thankfully, his facial expressions seem to only be capable of positive emotions.

I think he’ll be be just fine.

Filed Under: MUSINGS, Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address so you can get each post to your inbox. FRESH!

Join 20 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • Adam’s Top 10 Films of 2023
  • Adam’s Top 10 Films of 2022
  • Adam’s Top 10 TV of 2022
  • INKTHINK #30: Slither
  • INKTHINK #29: Patch
  • INKTHINK #28: Crispy
  • INKTHINK #27: Spark
  • INKTHINK #26: Connect

Copyright © 2025 · eleven40 Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • ABOUT ME
  • FILM
  • MUSINGS
  • BOOKS
  • DRAWINGS