ADAM MEMBREY

  • ABOUT ME
  • FILM
  • MUSINGS
  • BOOKS
  • DRAWINGS

The Lasting Power of Tiny Honest Moments: ‘Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates’

January 4, 2017 by Adam Membrey

 

Let me get this out of the way: Mike and Dave Need Wedding Dates is absolutely, gleefully R-rated. There is no joke too tasteless or visual gag too gross. Everything is out on the table, with it being very much a throw-everything-in-the-kitchen-at-the-wall-and-oh-hell-who-cares-if-anything-sticks effort. Everyone in the movie goes absolutely balls-out, including the MVP foursome of Adam Devine, Zac Efron, Aubrey Plaza, and the scrappy little nobody herself Anna Kendrick. Efron, as we should know by now, is some kind of national treasure. I almost think his muscles are distracting everyone from his incredible comic ability. Devine delivers a go-for-broke comedic performance that reminds me of Jim Carrey in Ace Ventura 2 in that there is no crazy face or idea he won’t explore at least once.

Beyond how hilarious this movie is, it does serve as a reminder that sometimes a little emotional through-line, regardless of how small or reaching, can make a huge difference.

The gist of the movie is that Mike (Adam Devine) and Dave (Zac Efron) are not only brothers but absolute pros at ruining every party they go to. They arrive stag, probably sleep with half the women, and inevitable cause some kind of destruction or injury. But this time: it’s their little sister’s wedding. They can’t screw up this time, their father demands. They must find nice girls to take to a beautiful destination wedding.

While the movie finds Mike and Dave struggling to make their alcohol-selling business work, Alice (Anna Kendrick) and Tatiana (Aubrey Plaza) are also struggling to make their reality something closer to their dreams. They see this opportunity to join Mike and Dave as a way to take a break from their disappointing-thus-far lives and have a once-in-a-lifetime experience.

The real emotional crux of the movie doesn’t reveal itself until deep into the story when Dave and Alice are walking through the Hawaiian woods, spitting out random ideas for Dave’s drawing projects, until Dave says:

Dave: “Do you ever get that feeling… that you’re not good enough to get what you really want… so you’re too scared to try?

Alice: “All the time.”

Dave: “Really?”

Alice: “Like, all the time. It’s terrifying. –

Dave: “It is, it’s terrifying.”

Alice: “Yeah. You’re, like, stuck.

Dave: “Totally.”

Alice: “Yeah.”

In the next 5-10 years, I imagine this movie will become something of a cult classic among millennials. It’s full of great to good to godawfully tastless jokes from start to finish, but that extra emotional string – something that everything can relate to – will make it stick to the wall just a little longer than most of the jokes.

Filed Under: FILM

Give It A Chance: ‘Maggie’s Plan’

January 3, 2017 by Adam Membrey

MAGGIE’S PLAN, from left: Travis Fimmel, Greta Gerwig, 2015. ph: Jon Pack/© Sony Pictures Classics

 

Maggie’s Plan opens quickly with its central conflict: Maggie (Greta Gerwig) is a young college professor looking to have a child, but with no real successful relationship to bolster it. So she has a solution: she’s got an old college friend willing to donate his sperm, and she’ll raise the child as a single mom.

The plan begins falling in place, like dominoes gently bumping into each other, until Maggie meets another professor, John (Ethan Hawke), who’s struggling to write his Next Great American Novel. She reads the first chapter, gives him the feedback he’s been longing for, and off they go. There’s just one problem: he’s married. With kids. She doesn’t realize that she’s not only inspiring him, but also giving him the attention his rising academic star Georgette  (Julianne Moore) can’t seem to afford him.

I’m not going to give away what happens, but I will say there is a point where Maggie realizes the romantic ideals she had may no longer hold weight. What began as a torrid love affair in which she inspired him to write the book he always felt he had in him – so romantic! – has been brushed with the banality and reality of family life a few too many times. At a certain point, Maggie wonders if she’s made a mistake. We don’t often see regret and the genuine inner crisis it births in movies. Often it’s glossed over. And even when Maggie’s Plan threatens to lean into a romantic triangle with way too tidy of an ending, it always, always remains true to the characters. Even the most ridiculous notions have their own internal logic to them, which makes them much easier to swallow. We may not agree with it, but we understand where they’re coming from.

The most jaw-dropping moment to me – the one I’m still thinking about months later – takes place only 20 minutes into the movie. The sperm donor friend Maggie has arranged for – a rather intense, quiet man with a burgeoning pickle business (no joke) – is about to take the donor container into the bathroom and take care of business. Just before he shuts the door, Maggie asks him – a former college math major – why he never became a mathematician.

Guy: I liked math because it was beautiful, that’s all. I never wanted to be a mathematician.

Maggie: Really? You think math is beautiful?

Guy: Anyone who’s touched even a hem of that garment knows it’s beautiful. For me, the hem was enough. Couldn’t have taken the frustration.

Maggie: What do you mean?

Guy: Never seeing the whole thing. You’re always just getting these glimpses of the whole picture. Spending my whole life for scraps of truth.

It sounds like a well-written throwaway mini-monologue, and I’m honestly shocked it’s not something that’s been picked up on or written about elsewhere (the fact the film only grossed $3,070 at the box office probably has something to do with it). But it says everything about the movie. It encapsulates the message in a few short lines from the mouth of a character that nobody – not Maggie, not even the audience – takes seriously.

You can see Maggie struggle throughout the film with never seeing the whole thing. She thinks she knows what a happy family and relationship knows and feels like. She thinks she knows what it takes to get there. But it’s not worked out at all the way she imagined. She’s just getting glimpses of the whole picture; she’s scrapping for truth in real and painful ways. Georgette and John, in their own ways, are also scrapping for these bits of truth. They thought their marriage was terrible, and it, oddly enough, took an affair to realize that maybe they weren’t as far off the mark as they thought.

And so it’s fitting, with her final shots, that director Rebecca Miller reintroduces this odd, rather deep man into the story, right at the last moment when happiness seems to be just around the corner and coming up the hill.

Still available for rent at Redbox and on iTunes. 

Filed Under: FILM

From Page to Screen: The Light Between Oceans and Me Before You

April 9, 2016 by Adam Membrey

Michael Fassbender stars as Tom Sherbourne and Alicia Vikander as his wife Isabel in DreamWorks Pictures' poignant drama THE LIGHT BETWEEN OCEANS, written and directed by Derek Cianfrance based on the acclaimed novel by M.L. Stedman.

By either serendipity or dumb luck, I found myself reading two upcoming film adaptations back-to-back. Both of them are fantastic in their own way. Both of them have trailers that show they are as perfectly-cast as you could hope for. And both of them will come out in 2016.

I began with M.L. Stedman’s 2012 novel The Light Between Oceans, which follows a young couple, Tom and Isabel, as they are living on a tiny lighthouse island off the coast of Western Australia. One day a small rowboat arrives, with a crying baby and a dead man aboard. Isabel, having just suffered with a series of miscarriages, and seeing that there is no proof of who the dead man is, suggests they keep the child. Tom, uncomfortable with them keeping a child that is clearly not their own, resists at first before accepting it may be for the best. All seems to be well until word carries out that the child’s real mother is still alive and has spent the past few years looking for her daughter.

To say any more would be criminal. This is a story that is beautifully told, but that also creates a situation in which sides will be chosen. I found myself sympathizing with Isabel’s point of view more than my co-worker, who strongly believed Isabel was in the wrong. It provides a great opportunity for discussion, and for a while, I felt the ending would be similarly conflicted. Whatever your opinion of the character’s actions may be, it does give way to one of the most beautiful endings I’ve ever read. It takes what could be a splintering reading experience and makes it something whole again.

Any movie that can boast having Michael Fassbender, Alicia Vikander, and Rachel Weisz is going to be worth anyone’s attention. Even better is that all the roles seem to be perfectly cast. But what I find the secret ingreident to be is writer/director Derek Cianfrance. His 2010 film Blue Valentine led a lot of couples to seriously examine their relationships and his ambitious 2012 film The Place Beyond the Pines seems to be gathering more praise as time goes on. All of this is to say this is not someone who does things in half-measures. You can be sure Cianfrance will dig for all the emotional depth the story provides, direct his actors to fantastic performances, and hopefully leave us with a film worth talking (and, who knows, maybe even arguing) about. It will hit theaters September 2nd, 2016.

MeBeforeYou

While Jojo Moyes’ Me Before You takes place in a completely different time period and location, it is similarly about choices and the consequences of them. Here we meet Louisa Clark, a small-town twenty-something who is suddenly out of a job. Her boyfriend has distractingly become more and more enamored with his own triathlon training. Her family needs some financial support and she has little sense of how to do it. That is, until she hears of a rather particular job offer: working as a personal assistant to Will Traynor, the son of a rather wealthy family that lives nearby.

As simple as the job sounds, the challenge becomes clear: Will is a quadriplegic who, due to a sudden accident, has been robbed of his adventurous, thrill-seeking life. He is now confined to his wheelchair, and with it, his future has been boxed away. The first day on the job leads to Louisa convinced she can’t do it. She can’t change the mind of a men set in his ways of darkened rooms and limited movement. Only through sheer persistence is she able to break some cracks in the armor and let things breathe a little.

Louisa is determined to save Will’s life and make him see all the possibilities ahead of him. Will, on the other hand, has already decided what he wants. It’s nearly halfway through the book before you understand this as a reader, and when you do, it changes everything. Like I said, this is also a book about choices and the consequences that come with them. There is still a rather hilarious, exciting, and heartwarming story to be found within this book. But it also all leads to an ending that I found rather heartbreakingly incredible, but that which may put off others. I give Moyes credit for staying true to her colorful cast of characters all the way to the end instead of using wish-fulfillment fantasies to leaven the truth. It provides an immensely satisfying story that I was not ready to let go of.

Like The Light Between Oceans, the filmic adaptation of Me Before You appears to be as perfectly cast as one could hope for. I actually heard about the adaptation taking place as I was reading the book, and once I knew Emilia Clarke (Daenerys Targaryen to many) would play Louisa, I couldn’t separate the two. She seems perfectly cast, and the rest of the movie follows suit. I, for one, can’t for wait for June 3rd to arrive.

Filed Under: BOOKS, FILM

The Spy Who Broke Me: 2015’s ‘Spectre’

March 19, 2016 by Adam Membrey

BOND

For most of my life, I had no way to connect with James Bond. I knew the name. I knew the ‘shaken, not stirred’ line. I knew he was spoofed in the Austin Powers films. Even the Pierce Brosnan era passed me by without leaving a mark. I enjoyed seeing some of the cool gadgets they came up with, but they were never enough to get me interested.

Then came Daniel Craig’s Bond. When Casino Royale hit 10 years ago (!), it rather deservedly changed everything. It told a compelling story with an even more compelling Bond girl in Eva Green’s Vesper Lynd. It had an interesting villain in Mads Mikkelsen and populated the screen with great British actors. The promise had been established; a new Bond had arrived, with sparkling new pedigree, and some badass, memorable action. I saw it at just the right time, when my interest in movies and their production had exponentially grown. I left the theater satisfied and excited for the new Craig adventures.

Two short years later, I spent my senior year of college mentoring some 45 freshmen, and it is such a strong memory of mine seeing how disappointed they were with 2008’s Quantum of Solace. Several students wrote “QOS Sux” on their whiteboards, after they had breathlessly waited for its release. That whole experience turned me off to the point where I never bothered to see it – even as it has earned back some goodwill over the years.

By the time Sam Mendes took over for 2012’s Skyfall, it felt like a beautiful course-correction of sorts. It had a compelling, haunting villain played by Javier Bardem, and it was expertly lensed by cinematography god Roger Deakins. I become punch-drunk in love with this movie as I saw it, enraptured by the confluence of images, action, and story.

So when 2015’s Spectre was announced, with Sam Mendes back at the helm, I was excited. By the time the movie came out, however, the response felt so much like Quantum of Solace: sharply divided opinions that praised the filmmaking craft but cared not one iota for the storytelling. Just as I ultimately didn’t get around to Quantum of Solace, I put off Spectre for months.

I finally saw it last week, and I understand the anger: Spectre is effectively the end of four movies of Bond origin, which is three more than was ever needed, leaving Craig’s Bond in a weird place both from a contractual and storytelling standpoint. Drew McWeeny of Hitfix and Devin Faraci of Birth.Movies.Death both articulated this much better than I. Skyfall finally ended with Bond where we all expected him to be, and yet Spectre almost immediately reneges on that.

My problems with Spectre are myriad, so I will just list them:

  • I am normally a fan of Sam Smith’s music, but that theme song has to be one of the least-deserving Oscar winners in a long time. It certainly didn’t help that it was coming off the heals of Adele’s all-timer of a Skyfall theme. It also didn’t help to find out the song Radiohead made for Spectre is massively better.
  • The movie begins with a helicopter fight scene that takes place over a massive Dias de los Muertos crowd. While it’s not weird to see a helicopter fly over a crowd, it is definitely weird to see one in which the helicopter is violently turning in unnatural ways with two men punching it out on the landing skids. And yet, the crowd never moves. Only when it is increasingly obvious that it will crash do people finally seem to go anywhere. Even worse: this should be a rousing fight, and yet it just seems to happen. Not great.
  • The main villain, while Bond’s most popular and well-known, was already devastatingly spoofed as Dr. Evil in the Austin Powers movies. To have your villain wear nearly the same outfit and get the same scar – and even throw in a cat! – feels so wrong in ways I cannot fully articulate.
  • It can be compelling when one character knows more than the others. It can be compelling when the audience knows more than the characters themselves. But it is never compelling when both rival characters know more than the audience does, and for no good reason. Bond and Blofield seem to know exactly what is going on, and they never bother to let us (or anyone) in on it. It just makes everything drag.
  • A lot of effort is made to take Bond and his new Bond girl to Blofield’s lair aka The House of Spectre. It’s blown up completely only 20 minutes later (or so it seems). What a waste.
  • The explanation for why Blofield is effectively destroying small pockets of the world (and thousands of lives) to chase one Mr. Bond is so lame that it’s infuriating.

However, you can’t spend 250 million on misguided storytelling without having some highlights, so in the spirit of having a Bondian Compliment Sandwhich (that doesn’t leave a bad aftertaste like the movie) here are some highlights:

  • The cinematography is pretty great. Even if Hoyte van Hoytema (Her, Interstellar) is not quite Roger Deakins, I do think he managed to do his best with a problematic story.
  • Mr. Hinx, played by Dave Bautista (Drax the Drestroyer from Guardians of the Galaxy), is a fantastic character and the highlight of the film for me. The only bummer with his performance is that it’s so short; I wanted him to hang around just a bit longer. In the meantime, he gets a couple scenes to rough people up a bit before really roughing up Bond in a spectacular train fight. I’m not sure how they pulled it off, but it looks as brutal and fun as possible. It just might top Spy‘s kitchen fight scene for Best Close Quarters Fight of 2015.
  • I’ve always wanted to see Ralph Fiennes get a little spy action in, and he gets a few pretty killer moments here. But having a delightful Ben Winshaw and resourceful Naomie Harris show up as Q and Moneypenny as well only reinforces how much these Craig Bond films would benefit from taking a more team-centric approach to missions.
  • It’s highly possible that you will watch this film, and absolutely none of the problematic areas in this will register with you and it will be a rather enjoyable movie-watching experience.

Considering how the press around Spectre seemed to dictate how much Daniel Craig does not want to play Bond again, who knows where the series will go from here. It could definitely do with bringing in another actor, but please, for the love of film and all things wonderful, do not make it another origin story.

Filed Under: FILM

A Little Bit of March Madness: The Sweet Sixteen of 2015

March 17, 2016 by Adam Membrey

DoofWarrior

It is now March 17, 2015. Seventy-seven whole days into the new year. Already over a 1/5 of 2016 has gone by. So I really struggled with making this my first post since July 28th until I realized that most of these movies on the list have either a) become available for home viewing, or b) will be available soon. These are the 16-plus movies of 2015 that have stuck with me, seventy-seven days into those new year. Enjoy!

2015’s Holy Trinity:

This special triumvirate of excellence all hold one thing in common: they trimmed the fat. There is absolutely no slack in the rope that pulls you throughout. Every scene counts and advances the story, even sometimes in ways you’re not immediately sure of. All three movies knew when to keep the pedal to the floor, and all knew when to back up and let things breathe a little. They explored big ideas and deep emotions. They represent, to me, the best of what 2015 had to offer. And then there’s an additional 15 films I thought of. If you call it cheating to have 3 films at #1, then you’ve got other things to worry about.

MadMax

1A. Mad Max: Fury Road – This movie starts with a car chase and never lets up. The accelerator is to the floor, gas pipes roaring across the blue sky. In a movie landscape that doesn’t know how to not over-explain everything, it’s incredibly refreshing to find a movie that respects your intelligence just as much as it lusts to keep you at the edge of your seat. This is propulsive action filmmaking that will be studied in film school for many years to come, with a dense mythology that only rewards the more you think about it. I saw this in May and it’s stuck to me ever since, like a sweet bit of broccoli stuck in my teeth, never keeping me from showing a big, dumb grin.

CREED

1B. Creed – I went in this expecting a good, strong effort, but never expected to be knocked out. It is ridiculous how well-made this film is – from the economy of the story to the performances to all the fine details that lead to an emotionally overpowering experience. I sat with my heart in my throat for at least 2/3 of this movie, and it earned every moment. This is a movie that deserves every string of superlatives thrown at it, wrapping it up into one beautiful, never-ending gift.

EX MACHINA

1C. Ex Machina – You would never know that this is writer Alex Garland’s first time behind the camera. Every frame is carefully composed. Every set is immaculately designed. There is an economy of story here that only an expert writer can manage. I still laugh at the first time Caleb (Domnhall Gleeson) flies to Nathan’s (Oscar Isaac) residence and asks when they will be approaching his home. The helicopter pilot chuckles and tells him, “We’ve been flying over it the last two hours”. It’s such a simple exchange, but one that communicates volumes. Caleb and Nathan have a series of conversations throughout the film all dedicated to the problem they are trying to solve: will Nathan’s robotic creations pass the Turing Test? Will we be able to tell they are a robot, or will they pass as human? It’s an ever-evolving, thought-provoking stream of exchanges that carries throughout the film until the very last frame, where Ava (Alicia Vikander) effectively answers their question in a way they can’t respond to. While Gleeson and Isaac have been doing great work lately and are expectedly excellent here, it’s Vikander’s performance that sticks the most. She finds a beautiful line between the mannered movements we expect from a robot, and the smoother instincts of one striving to be more human. Nathan’s entire residence, a true creation of a location, is all glass doors and entrances. Every time we see a character approach the glass, they’re reflected in a different way. It’s a rather complex but satisfying way to communicate to us just how intricate and unpredictable our definition of human is, and how quickly, with just the slightest of moves, it can change.

Brooklyn

2. Brooklyn – Before the first frame of this film rolled, I knew I was walking into something special. Normally you can expect there to be a solid 15-20 minutes of trailers before the movie starts, and you can also expect that people are going to usher in right until the last moment before the story begins. This is, at least, what commercial theaters have conditioned me to expect. And yet, as we walked in to the theater just a few minutes after the designated start time, we hit a wall of darkness. We could only see the faintest of shiny bald heads, and it was enough to tell us one thing: this place was full. Packed. I don’t want to overgeneralize about ages, but they were all over 40 or 50 years old, and either this story hits them in a deeply personal way, or it’s the rock-solid kind of story we’ve all been starved to see, or it’s some combination of the two. I can’t tell exactly, but it doesn’t matter. Nick Hornby, who impressed me so thoroughly with his adaptation of last year’s Wild, gives the story a gorgeously simple framework to lay the tapestry over. Led by the suddenly grown-up Saoirse Ronan, everyone here gives an honest, true performance, the kind that sinks you deep into the story and yet warms the insides. In our day of technology and the internet, the meaning of ‘home’ has hung over your heads in so many ways. Long gone are the days in which people always stayed in their hometown, from birth to death. We have so many new ways to connect, as well as ever more options for transportation, and it’s led to a semi-nomadic life that, while exciting, can freak us out when we have to consider what home means to us. It’s a question that’s as timely as ever to our generation, and delivered with maximum emotional impact. This is the kind of movie you can watch with anyone, finding the universal in the specific, and guiding us through a story that reminds us home is where we are happy and where we want to be.

WhatWeDo

3. What We Do in the Shadows – The first five minutes of this movie had me laughing as hard as anything I’ve seen all year, and yet, I wondered: would it keep it up? While I continued to laugh throughout the film in all kinds of ways – giggles, barks, and guffaws – the story goes into very interesting, unexpectedly emotional directions in exploring just what it’s like to be these vampires and how it affects the lives around them. It gives a surprising gravitas to the delightful comedy, making it hit all the harder.

Brooklyn lawyer James Donovan (Tom Hanks) meets with his client Rudolf Abel (Mark Rylance), a Soviet agent arrested in the U.S. in DreamWorks Pictures/Fox 2000 PIctures' dramatic thriller BRIDGE OF SPIES, directed by Steven Spielberg.

4. Bridge of Spies – I went into this movie not really understanding what the story would be about – it turns out you can read a synopsis 900 times and still not have a clue – but it didn’t matter. Beyond the effortless craft that blows you away scene by scene (this is what you get watching a movie from a master like Spielberg), this is a story that seems deceptively simple before sucking you in entirely. It’s a movie for the cynical age we live in, and especially timely in the face of the wrongful elitism that our presidential candidates speak with. Set in the Cold War, Tom Hanks’ character has a simple task – to defend a Russian criminal just enough it looks like the US tried, but not enough to save him – and yet he cannot let go of this kind, gentle man. To say anymore would be criminal – this is a movie as well told as anything you’ll see this year, and one that leaves you with plenty to think about.

InsideOut

5. Inside Out – There is a simple equation that exists deep inside the halls of Pixar and in any well-educated cinephile’s brain: Pixar + Pete Doctor = Greatness. From Monsters, Inc. to Up and now to Inside Out, Doctor has shown an uncanny ability to create unique stories with unforgettable moments and the kind of emotional stakes that drain every bit of available water out of your body. Here, Doctor is in peak form, crafting a deceptively simple adventure story that all takes place within the mind of a young, growing girl. Even more impressive – though not surprising – is how well thought-out every single thing in this movie is. The Train of Thought, the Deep End, the list goes on – and the overall message of how Joy and Sadness are more alike than they are different is one that everyone deserves to witness.

KINGSMAN

6. Kingsman: The Secret Service – Matthew Vaughn has a habit of jumping movies to create something even more close to his heart. He famously left Days of Future Past when the opportunity to make Kingsman arose. And boy, can you tell. Fueled by undeniable energy and British bite, this is the kind of fun James Bond story we all wanted before he become so, so serious. Newcomer Taron Egerton is a real find – as the quality of his upcoming movies would suggest – and the rest of the cast brings their usual A-game to the festivities.

BONET

7. Bone Tomahawk – While seeing Kurt Russell in a Western (and with epic facial hair) is always going to get me out of bed, the performance that will stick with you is Richard Jenkin’s turn as Chicory. This is one of those sneaky movies that moves like a good, simple men-on-a-mission yarn until it hits the badlands and then it hits the badlands. The otherworldly tribe Russell and Jenkins run into is something out of another, weirder movie. It possesses probably the most horrific movie kill I’ve seen in a long time (you’ve been warned!) but also the most heartbreaking bit of dialogue from Jenkins, in which Chicory’s optimism depends on whether a flea circus is a real thing or not. The electric dialogue is very Coen Brothers-ish in its constant glee of using Western language quirks to make for a gut-busting listen, and the theme music has been stuck in my head for days now. Hopefully people will give this little sleeper of a movie a chance in the coming generations.

GIFT

8. The Gift – Speaking of gifts: holy hell. The movie trailer for this sat in front of just about every movie this past summer, leading me (and presumably all of America) to assume it was some dark, nasty thriller. But looks can be deceiving. While there is a bit of nastiness to this, it’s far more emotional and intellectual than anything physical. It also possesses one of the best last act twists I have ever seen in a movie.

Chi-RAQ

9. Chi-Raq – You may want to check your electric bill after watching this movie as there is something pulsing and crackling throughout this entire story. Spike Lee is back with a movie that is as angry as it is aiming for something resembling hope. A modern-day, satirical take on the Greek play Lysistrata, Lee uses it to great effect in looking at the gang violence in south Chicago in a whole new way. For many people, unfortunately, this is going to be their first exposure to what is actually going on in Chicago, a place in which, from 2003-2012 saw 4,265 citizens murdered. In a time in which our gun control conversation is more heated than ever, it’s movies like this that help us realize we are really missing the point: that there is something far more devastating going on in the middle of our country, and which we are either clueless of or have chosen to ignore. Lee makes this a story that hits you hard by balancing it with extremes – every heartbreaking scene is followed by something full of life and often hilarious. While it make seem jarring at first, it shows just how close comedy is to tragedy and vice versa. We have a long way to go in this country, and Lee lets us know where perhaps our biggest gap is in bright, entertaining, and ultimately devastating fashion.

PADDINGTON

10. Paddington – Just like The Gift, Paddington had omnipresent movie trailers early on that did the movie no favors. The first teaser, in which Paddington makes a genuine wreck out of a well-decorated bathroom, made it look like a rather condescendingly slapstick story, one of which would slip through the door and under someone’s bed, completely unnoticed. And then the reviews trickled in. They all said it was not only something more, but something kind of wonderful. And it is. Every bit of it. Every detail in this movie is delightful, but more than anything, it has such a pleasant air of goodness to it that you rarely see in movies these days.

CallMeLucky

11. Call Me Lucky – This movie fell on to my radar thanks to a stellar debut at Sundance, and then disappeared before popping up on iTunes. I went ahead with it and am so grateful I did. I won’t say anymore as to spoil the story for anyone, but for anyone who thinks stand-up comedians are just damaged folks who tell jokes to mask their pain – this will give you some food for thought. Barry Crimmins – thanks to the testimonials of all the Boston comics you will no doubt recognize – was a rising comic, respected by all before he decided to pick a fight bigger than himself. Director Bobcat Goldwaith gives the story all the space and respect it deserves, carefully stepping into pretty deep and dark waters that will devastate you as much as give you hope.

GoodDinosaur

12. The Good Dinosaur – Pixar raised a few eyebrows in the production of this film when it changed directors and delayed it 18 months. The story wasn’t working, they said. They needed more time and some new blood. Given the fact that previous revamped movies have led to results such as Toy Story 2, Ratatouille, and even Brave, we all gave them the benefit of the doubt. While you can definitely tell the movie went through some production nightmares – the story is noticeably slimmed down and simple, and the weirder elements involve changes that were probably more cost-effective to implement (voice acting, for example) – it is pretty amazing to me just how much they were able to accomplish. I have to give serious props to director Peter Sohn and his team for their visual rhyming. They do a masterful job of bookending the film with images that start meaning one thing in the beginning and something entirely else by the end (and bring on the tears). The central relationship in this movie – between Arlo and his “dog”, Spot – is so well-calibrated and developed that if you aren’t in total, complete tears by the time Arlo draws a circle in the dirt around Spot’s new family, you’ve probably missed out on the magic. While many critics were quick to consider this film one of Pixar’s lesser efforts, I think, all things considered, they have quite a bit to be proud of with this one.

Trainwreck

13. Trainwreck – Having been a major fan of Inside Amy Schumer for the last few years, I could not have been more ready for her big-screen writing and acting debut. While the trailers understandably pushed the comedy angle, there is a deeper emotional core to the film that really caught me off-guard. In the film (and real life) Amy and her sister have to deal with the very trying circumstances of taking care of a womanizing father who’s succumbing more and more each day to the trials of MS. It creates a transforming anchor for the movie that helps the comedy have a bit more weight, especially as Amy has to fight through some very real emotional landmines before blossoming into a new person that’s a little more ready to live up to her potential. While very few films made me laugh as hard as this one, director Judd Apatow’s love of padding his movies with unnecessary improve takes it down a notch or two in my mind. Otherwise, this is an effort that announces to the world that Amy Schumer is ready to take over.

Marvel's Ant-Man..Scott Lang/Ant-Man (Paul Rudd)..Photo Credit: Zade Rosenthal..? Marvel 2014

14. Ant-Man – This past summer, two Marvel movies were released only a couple months from each other: Avengers: Age of Ultron and this much smaller film, Ant-Man. In terms of budget and star-power, Ultron stood over Ant-Man like an ever-growing shadow. But if I would bet if you asked anyone these days which one they would rather watch again – most would reach for the diminutive dynamo. I guess we shouldn’t have been surprised with a movie that had Paul Rudd, Michael Douglas, and comedy secret superweapon Michael Pena in it, but while the story has the familiar Marvel tropes it has to do deal with to set up future movies, it has a great deal of fun with just how weird Ant-Man really is. Also within this film is one of the best 3rd acts of 2015. After we had been bludgeoned with 3rd Act after 3rd Act that involved the destruction of entire cities and planets, it proved incredibly refreshing to have an entire epic fight take place within a suitcase, a child’s train set, and finally a bedroom. Director Peyton Reed clearly brought his A-game, love for Ant-Man, and creative solutions to this film, giving it a texture and sense of fun that even some of Marvel’s best have sometimes lacked.

SPY

15. Spy – It’s a pretty special year to get not one but two great spy movies that show us how much fun this kind of thing can be. While Paul Feig is getting better at shooting action, he wisely keeps his focus on his fantastic actors and their hilarious dialogue. Jason Statham proves to be quite the funnyman, and Melissa McCarthy gets to play an entirely new, exceedingly competent character that shows how she can kick ass and make it look fantastic. Also, an all-timer: the brutal, hilarious kitchen fight.

ShauntheSheep

16. Shaun the Sheep Movie – There is no dialogue in this movie. It’s a rather simple story. As expected: it entirely went over the heads of American audiences when it hit theaters back in August. But I will say this: I watched this with two young girls who frequently struggle to pay attention during movies (or during anything, really), and they were completely transfixed by this film the entire time. There is enough effortless wit in all the character’s movements to intimidate the most vaunted of comedy writers, and all I can say is: Aardman did it again.

Beating the Odds:

Lily James is Cinderella and Richard Madden is the Prince in Disney's live-action feature inspired by the classic fairy tale, CINDERELLA, which brings to life the timeless images in Disney's 1950 animated masterpiece as fully-realized characters in a visually-dazzlling spectacle for a whole new generation.

Cinderella – For those of you reading this and scoffing at home – give it a try yourself. There’s nothing new in the story, but man, it is told well. The scene where Rob Stark aka The Prince sees Cinderella arrive at the ball in her new dress for the first time is about as honest and beautiful a fairy tale scene I’ve ever seen. All the actors approach this movie with care and eagerness, making an age-old story feel both modern and timeless.

Saved By The Bell: 

JurassicWorld

Jurassic World – I grew up on Jurassic Park. I had the toys – the Ford Explorer with the cannon mounted to the roof and bite marks in the engine; the T-Rex with a mouth that became menacingly agape whenever you squeezed its neck – and so when The Lost World bounced into theaters, I was ready. It took me a really long time, and many, many viewings to figure out why The Lost World didn’t grab me like Jurassic Park did. It had more dinosaurs, cooler vehicles – bigger and better in the ways that appeals to a young teenage boy. After college, I took another look at it and solved the mystery: The Lost Word is not a good movie. I followed the production of Jurassic Park 3 only to shrug it off like much of the moviegoing public did in 2001. Fifteen years later, I was ready to forgive. I was ready to accept the fact my teenage brain had not aged like my body, and that big, badass dinosaurs still set off the pleasure centers in my brain better than mint chocolate chip ice cream on a summer day. As much as I enjoyed seeing a fully functional, open-to-the-public park – the kind of thing I still one day dream of witnessing – Jurassic World didn’t fully click into place for me until the very end. Watching that same T-Rex that so enthralled me as a kid lumber out of the padlock to save the day, only for the giant mesosaurus to really save the day set off those same teenage brain pleasure centers like a bag of malfunctioning alarms. I went absolutely nuts for it. I still have no idea where the story will go with the next movie. I’m not sure how much I even want to see it. But I will always cherish that final battle, where it felt like adults became the kids they always wanted to be and just had some good old prehistoric fun.

Tripped Up at the Finish Line: 

MagicMikeXXL

Magic Mike XXL – I never got around to seeing Magic Mike, but the buzz on this film had me curious. It promised something unexpected. A message that didn’t come up often in your average mainstream film. And sure enough, Magic Mike XXL has a lot to say, specifically about how important it is to do what you love and to treat the ones you love with the passion and respect they deserve. It had me all the way until the end, and then it blew it. The finale at Myrtle Beach is supposed to be the culmination of everything the film has worked for, and while it truly delivers with the final dance sequences, it films them in a way that lets every bit of air out of the bag. Every time Jada Pinkett Smith is on screen, she’s filmed from what seems like a mile away, and the energy disappears before it can even begin to build. What should be a final, fiery climax instead can’t quite get it up.

ItFollows

It Follows – This is a film that is an absolute masterclass in tone. From the very first frame, you know something is up, and the steady camera movement and plaintive, insistent music just feeds the paranoia. But by the end, I felt completely underwhelmed. Each film sets up its own reality and its own rules. It Follows does this with minimal exposition and great visual storytelling. But then when it really matters, it completely throws the rules out the window. It feels like such a cheat and, more than that, completely confusing. Quentin seemed to agree. 

Tomorrowland

Tomorrowland – There is a lot to like here. Brad Bird directs. Keegan-Michael Key and Kathryn Hahn are a slightly-off hippy couple with an interesting small business venture. George Clooney. The first visit to Tomorrowland is packed with imagination and even dashes of wonder. There is a compelling mystery that is being built, but the third act provides an answer that just does absolutely nothing for me. I found it confusing and full of bizarre choices that just didn’t quite add up.

Thankful For:

JupiterAscending

Jupiter Ascending – The original script was reportedly 475 pages. The average Hollywood script is about 110. If you have to condense your original story down to nearly 1/4 the size, the audience will feel it. While the actual plot itself is not particularly original, the mythology behind it is so dense it nearly stops the entire movie each time it finally gets going. Remember how Ant-Man shrinks to a tiny size but retains it’s density and, therefore, is pretty unstoppable? That’s the story machine running through this film. Once it hits the mythology beats, it becomes an immovable force and slogs through. This probably could have been made into a very expensive miniseries on cable and been given some more time to breathe. All that aside: we don’t see texture and detail like this in sci-fi very often. The designers of everything you see in the film cited many older European buildings as their inspiration and you can totally see it. Less and less are we seeing original stories given huge budgets and the chances to go in unique places – I’m just thankful the Wachowskis were able to squeak this one through the system and make it a reality.

MonkeyKingdom

Monkey Kingdom – If you’ve ever wanted to see a pack of monkeys ransack – and I mean ransack – a local school, robbing them of food supplies and knocking over damn near everything, then this is the movie for you. I’m not sure how they found a way to film all of this, but I’m certainly glad they did.

AvengersAgeofUltron

Avengers: Age of Ultron – I feel for Joss Whedon. It’s just about a miracle to me that he was able to string together all the storylines coming in from Phase 2 and push them out until Phase 3, all while introducing a new villian. There’s a lot of heavy lifting he’s gotta do throughout this film, and yet he keeps it fun and light. I do see why it ended up defeating him, and I do think the 3rd act rescue of all the citizens of Sokovia was a bit of a rash reaction to Man of Steel and Stark Trek Into Darkness’ destruction porn. There’s a lot to like about this film, lots of little moments Whedon clearly fought for, but they’re also lost in all the machinery that is Marvel’s ongoing story.

Aloha

Aloha – I’m happy to have Cameron Crowe back, even as I wish this was a better movie. I don’t think this is the awful movie the critics made out it out to be. Yes, they probably should have hired someone at least vaguely Hawaiian for Emma Stone’s part. Yes, it does feel like 3 movies packed into one, as if Crowe did a writing exercise and then cobbled them together quickly. And yes, there is still a lot of shit that just doesn’t make any sense. But! But! There are also those Crowe moments sprinkled around just enough to remind us of why we liked the guy’s work in the first place. Sometimes you gotta have a movie to shake off all the rust, and here’s hoping this is Crowe’s way of getting up from off the floor again and making something worthy of his talent.

StarWars

Star Wars: The Force Awakens – Like many JJ Abrams movies, this one had the all the zip and pace you could ask for. And then afterwards, the more I thought about it, the more it fell apart. You can clearly tell with this film just how much they were figuring out as they went along, and look: I get it. I totally get it. This was the assignment no one had the balls to take; to make the first good Star Wars movie in nearly 40 years, and to give Disney the confidence their investment would pay off (like we ever doubted that?). I will give Abrams and his crew this, though: I absolutely love the new characters, and I would say that TFA’s greatest strength is in just how damn excited it made me for Episode 8. There’s a new force that has awaken, and it is truly exciting to witness.

TheTribe

The Tribe – All my life, I have grown up surrounded by people that find sign language so, so fascinating. They find it beautiful. Enchanting, even. But while it is all those attributes, it is also a language. One of the biggest obstacles that Deaf filmmakers have had with making great movies is that sometimes what is demanded in a film with sign language defies the typical film language we are used to. We can’t do voiceover. We can’t cut to other actors when someone else is talking unless we want to miss out on all the dialogue. It’s a language that demands to be seen at all times in order for it to be taken in. To me, that’s created a challenge that has rarely been answered, and one that is an ever-evolving conversation. So when I first heard about The Tribe, and how it it used Ukrainian sign language without the benefit of English subtitles, I was definitely intrigued. But I was also wary – and ultimately curious – if this would be a story that could separate itself from the language question and tell an actual story. I will say the movie tells the story very well – even if it’s rather standard and something we’ve seen many, many times before, but what makes it most memorable is the very end. You’re not going to sleep very well after this movie, especially if, like me, you sleep in total silence.

Filed Under: FILM

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • Next Page »

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address so you can get each post to your inbox. FRESH!

Join 20 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • Adam’s Top 10 Films of 2023
  • Adam’s Top 10 Films of 2022
  • Adam’s Top 10 TV of 2022
  • INKTHINK #30: Slither
  • INKTHINK #29: Patch
  • INKTHINK #28: Crispy
  • INKTHINK #27: Spark
  • INKTHINK #26: Connect

Copyright © 2025 · eleven40 Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • ABOUT ME
  • FILM
  • MUSINGS
  • BOOKS
  • DRAWINGS